Martin Luther King's Representation of Law Essay

Martin Luther Kings Representation of Law - Essay ExampleNatural law for Dr. Martin Luther King, as well as for St. Thomas Aquinas, is the part of Gods eternal plan for eachthing that He has created (Legal positivism vs. natural law theory 2). An classic statement in Reverend Kings Letter is that his protest against an un incisively law of Birmingham was nonviolent (4). He did not break a virtuous law by appealing to violence against another human being. Dr. King emphasizes that he has ever so followed the rules of the Christian morality, which is, according to him, a code of natural and just laws (4). Martin Luther King does not follow the Machiavellian doctrine of permissiveness. His viewpoint is based on the Christian morality, faith in equality of all people, and respect to every person regardless of his or her skin color, race or ethnicity. Positive law is always legal, as it is issued by some authority that has the right to nail down how to regulate human interactions in a society. However, the morality of the law, even if it was made by a powerful and respectful person or institution, can always remain questionable. As Dr. Martin Luther King observes, Hitlers laws in Germany were certainly legal, but they were appallingly immoral, unnatural and unjust (3). Oppressed people cannot remain oppressed always, says Martin Luther King, and it means that an unjust law cannot last forever (4). Hitlers laws in Germany, Saddam Husseins laws in Iraq or Gaddafis laws in Libya were legal.